The author provides a good analysis in the object of his study, but affords Scofield too much respect, referring to him as "Doctor" when in fact he never earned a D.D. and was getting a divorce at the same time he was being ordained to pastor. Had the author had accurate biographical information on Scofield as we now have through the works of J. Canfield (1988), C.G. weston (1997), and D.J. Rushing (2011), I expect there would have been far less patience with the man's subtleties of mixing his novel and sectarian doctrines in with the inspired texts.